What Companies Use Animals For Product Testng

Brute Testing & Cosmetics

Consumers and manufacturers sometimes ask almost the utilize of animals for testing cosmetics. The following information addresses the legal requirement for cosmetic safety and FDA policy on developing alternative methods.

FDA is responsible for assuring that cosmetics are safety and properly labeled. This mission is achieved through enforcement of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Human activity (FD&C Act), related statutes, and regulations promulgated under these laws.

The FD&C Act does not specifically require the employ of animals in testing cosmetics for safety, nor does the Act subject cosmetics to FDA premarket approval. Nonetheless, the agency has consistently advised corrective manufacturers to employ whatever testing is appropriate and constructive for substantiating the safety of their products. It remains the responsibility of the manufacturer to substantiate the safety of both ingredients and finished cosmetic products prior to marketing.

Beast testing by manufacturers seeking to market new products may be used to establish product safety. In some cases, after because bachelor alternatives, companies may determine that animal testing is necessary to assure the safety of a product or ingredient. FDA supports and adheres to the provisions of applicative laws, regulations, and policies governing animal testing, including the Creature Welfare Act and the Public Health Service Policy of Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Moreover, in all cases where animate being testing is used, FDA advocates that enquiry and testing derive the maximum amount of useful scientific information from the minimum number of animals and utilise the nearly humane methods available within the limits of scientific adequacy.

Nosotros as well believe that prior to use of animals, consideration should be given to the use of scientifically valid alternative methods to whole-animal testing. In 1997, FDA joined with 13 other Federal agencies in forming the Interagency Coordinating Commission on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM). ICCVAM and its supporting middle, the National Toxicology Plan Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Culling Toxicological Methods (NICEATM), coordinate the evolution, validation, credence, and harmonization of alternative toxicological test methods throughout the U.S. Federal Government. To learn more, visit the ICCVAM and NICEATM websites.

FDA supports the evolution and use of alternatives to whole-animal testing as well as adherence to the most humane methods available within the limits of scientific capability when animals are used for testing the safety of cosmetic products. We will continue to be a strong advocate of methodologies for the refinement, reduction, and replacement of animate being tests with culling methodologies that do non employ the apply of animals.

More Resources from FDA:

"Cruelty Complimentary-Non Tested on Animals" Label Claims
FDA Authority Over Cosmetics

Resources from Other U.S. Government Agencies:

Animal Welfare Human action
National Toxicology Programme--Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Culling Exam Methods (NTP-ICCVAM)
Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals

Resources from the International Cooperation on Cosmetics Regulation (ICCR):

ICCR reports on nanotechnology, trace contaminants, safety assessment, and alternatives to animal testing: Past clicking on this link, y'all will exist leaving the FDA.GOV website and going to the ICCR website, where you lot will observe the reports on these topics.